🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.