🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."