🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by more than half, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish different wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.